May 10 1998 FAR EAST
The Sunday Times (of London)
Burmese junta forces farmers to grow opium
by Cathy Scott-Clark
and Adrian Levy, Rangoon
THE military government of Burma, the world's biggest producer of opium,
has driven thousands of villagers from their homes in a programme to
transform rice fields into poppy plantations, despite receiving millions
of
pounds a year from the United Nations to combat drugs.
An investigation by The Sunday Times and human rights groups has
established that the junta is secretly expanding the number of opium
farms
in designated "drug-control areas".
The regime has used video footage which appears to show poppy fields
being
destroyed to support applications for UN aid. But interviews with farmers,
soldiers and former civil servants have confirmed that the military
presides over a huge network of opium-producing villages in regions
officially said to be drug-free.
Last January 5,000 people were evicted from one village alone - Ngape,
in
the Arakan Yoma mountain range in central Burma. The government claimed
they had been ordered out for refusing to destroy poppy crops. However,
a
farmer who sought refuge on Burma's border with India said: "We had
never
grown opium before. The soldiers said we had to plant poppies or lose
our
land."
Opium farmers were brought in from other parts of the country, according
to
a 34-year-old woman from Ngape who left her home and possessions behind.
"This was not a drug clearance scheme - the army hijacked our land
to grow
drugs," she said.
Aid workers admit that restrictions on their movements render them
powerless to make checks. "There is no independent monitoring," said
a
source at the UN drug control programme, which will spend £4m
in Burma in
the next year.
Under the totalitarian rule of the State Peace and Development Council,
Burma has become a narco-dictatorship. According to officials in
Washington, Burma produces 250 tonnes of opium a year, more than twice
as
much as Afghanistan, the second-largest manufacturer. Robin Cook, the
foreign secretary, says in a forthcoming report by the South Asian
Information Network, a British human rights group: "The failure of
the
regime to address this issue, the production of heroin - indeed, their
apparent willingness to abet and profit from the drug trade - deserves
the
strongest condemnation."
The victims of Burma's burgeoning narco-economy can be seen in bamboo
huts
in many outlying areas, where addiction to opium is widespread. Pang
Sak,
in the northern Kachin state, has become known as the "village of the
widows" following hundreds of deaths from overdoses. Doctors claim
there
are "drug addicts in every house here". Among those who died after
being
forced by the military to cultivate opium poppies instead of rice was
the
father of Aung Than, a seven-year-old boy who now uses an opium pipe
himself. "The smoke makes my hunger go away," he said.
Next door, the women of the Nhkum family are mourning three sons, aged
13,
17 and 21, all of whom died from overdoses of heroin.
The poppies are everywhere. In Chin state, northwestern Burma, which
the
government has proclaimed free from opium production, retired police
officers said poppy fields were plentiful. The army has set aside more
than
15 acres of land around some villages to grow the crop.
Each grower is obliged to pay an annual licence fee of about £25
to the
Central Committee for Drug Abuse Control, a government department funded
by
the UN, and £13 to the police. Every cultivated acre yields 6kg
of opium
paste, which is sold for £220. Ten villages can yield enough
opium to
produce 80kg of pure heroin in refineries - worth £15m on Britain's
streets.
Farmers and former couriers say six new refineries to turn raw opium
into
heroin have sprung up along the Chindwin river - all reportedly guarded
by
Burmese army battalions. One former army officer said his superior
had
recently taken 35kg of heroin in his car and sold it for £500,000
on the
Indian frontier.
Myo Min, a border trader, told Images Asia, a human rights group based
in
Thailand, that he had seen many military officials transporting drugs.
"Army officers and soldiers participate in the drug trade. I saw
high-ranking military personnel buying and carrying opium and heroin.
I
have never seen them arrested."
Other traders and drivers on the border of Burma and India said they
had
been issued with military passes signed by Khin Nyunt, one of the most
powerful men in the junta. On the Thai-Burma border, a checkpoint guard
in
eastern Shan state said he had stopped a trailer loaded with heroin
and had
been presented with a pass signed by Khin Nyunt. He telephoned the
general's office in Rangoon and was told to let the trailer pass as
the
drugs were being transported to a destruction centre. The load was
never
seen again.
May 10 1998 FAR EAST
Briton held as 'mercenary'
A BRITISH human rights campaigner was being held by Burma's military
regime
this weekend accused of being a mercenary and spreading subversive
literature, writes Peter Conradi.
British officials were yesterday seeking permission to visit James
Maudsley, 25, who was arrested last week in a market in Moulmein, south
of
Rangoon. An official Burmese newspaper, labelled him a "mercenary terrorist
foreigner" with links to the Karen National Union, a group opposed
to the
government.
Maudsley, who holds British and Australian passports, was expelled from
Burma last September after chaining himself to railings in a protest
in
front of a school in Rangoon. He re-entered the country a few weeks
ago
from Thailand.
In a letter sent last month to his father, David Maudsley, from Chiang
Mai
in northern Thailand, he wrote: "It may seem from the outside that
things
are risky for me but they're not. I have no intention of doing anything
rash. It may be one thing to die for a cause, but it is altogether
harder
and potentially more effective to live for a cause."
David Maudsley said his son was not a mercenary. "He does not carry
a gun
and has never had any military training. He's just interested in human
rights."
Maudsley, who is also accused of entering Burma illegally, does not
appear
to have been formally charged. His father said: "It seems much more
serious
than last year. I am worried that they will pin something on him and
lock
him up for a great deal of time."
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a
prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only.