This is the only example we have received that I am aware of, of a lengthy response from Pacifica National Board member Ken Ford from Washington, DC on the issues. Several other other listeners have reported either no response, or in two cases very brief replies of "get a life" and "fuck you." Ford gives a version of events diametrically opposed to the common understanding. --LG
ORIGINAL LETTER FROM KPFK LISTENER JEAN OGDEN
-----------------------------------------
From:
"Jean Ogden" <jeanogden@email.msn.com>
To:
<kford@nahb.com>
Subject: Pacifica
Debacle
Date sent: Thu, 15 Jul 1999
03:05:31 -0700
Dear Mr.. Ford:
I have just finished reading a number of transcripts and a great deal of other information, both pro and con, about the events now taking place with regard to the Pacifica Foundation and its radio stations. I have never been what anyone would consider an "activist" for any causes, nor have I ever written to a stranger about anything until now (I've never even written to any of my elected officials before - but after what I've read tonight, I will be contacting all of them about this issue!!)
Your conduct in this matter is utterly reprehensible, quite probably illegal, and possibly criminal; I can only say that I hope, in the final analysis, you are held, at a minimum, financially liable for your actions and you are left completely penniless, you lose your position on the Pacifica Board of Directors, and that you NEVER serve in any position of authority whatsoever in either government or the private sector for the rest of your life. Anything less would not be punishment enough for such egregious behavior as yours.
Sincerely,
Mrs.. J.L. Ogden
----------------------------------------------------------
KEN FORD REPLIES
-----Original Message-----
From: Ford, Ken <kford@nahb.com>
To: 'Jean Ogden' <jeanogden@email.msn.com>
Date: Thursday, July 15, 1999 1:31 PM
Subject: RE: Pacifica Debacle
>MS. Ogden,
>
>For someone who has never written a stranger, you appear to wish
a great
>deal of misfortune for me in the future. I am not sure what
information you
>have read, but I am absolutely sure it is not truthful. I
agree with you,
>the situation is utterly reprehensible, however do not and I repeat
do not
>cast your venom toward the Pacifica Board. We are stewards
of not only your
>radio station but 4 others as well and inspire of what bias propaganda
you
>have access to, we are performing our duties in a truly professional
manner.
>
>
>Your local situation is not our fault. It is the work of
a group of local
>community people who bear a grudge against Pacifica. Since
April, you have
>listen to KPFA staff crapping about how they were being victimized
by
>Pacifica management. Ever wonder why you never heard from
Pacifica
>management? Simple fact is that the staff took control of
the airways and
>put out tons of dis-information and out right lies as to
what was going on.
>Lynn Chadwick attempted to stop this action and was especially
told to take
>a hike. She and Dr. Berry were not allowed to go on
the air of a station
>that they are responsible for. Imagine telling the person who signs
your
>paycheck and is your boss that they can not utilize the assets
of the
>network. Why don't you tell your boss something like that
and see what
>happens. How crazy is this? It took us 3 days
of negotiations with the
>ringleaders of this coup for Dr. Berry to do her call-in broadcast
a few
>months ago which the staff later sabotaged.
>
>They have called for mediations. Well, we started the process
7 weeks ago
>with the union that represents the staff. They were FORCED
to leave the
>bargaining table by those, in your community, who are out to destroy
KPFA.
>They want this valuable assets for their own purposes and not the
>communities. Our mission is to continue to provide original
local
>programming. Right now we have to sort things out and find
out who wants to
>work toward that goal. Please read the following for a better
perspective.
>
> <<PRESS RELEASE - CALL FOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH KPFA.doc>>
<<PRESS RELEASE -
>STATEMENT FROM MARY FRANCES BERRY.doc>> <<Re PRESS
RELEASE - CALL FOR
>NEGOTIATIONS WITH KPFA.doc>>
JEAN OGDEN'S REJOINDER
____________________________________
Dear Mr.. Ford:
Unfortunately for you and the rest of the board
of Pacifica, I am a resident of Southern California (San Diego County),
and don't even listen to the Berkeley station, which means I'm actually
unbiased in this matter. (I
do, on occasion, when I am in their broadcast
area, listen to the L.A. station.) In addition, I am a university educated,
upper middle class woman with little prior knowledge or any stake in your
stations. However, my
opinion of the unconscionable behavior of
the Pacifica board is based mainly on the transcripts of several board
meetings published on the web. You and your associates have behaved
in a condescending and high-handed manner throughout those transcripts,
which is certainly not what I would describe as "performing your duties
in a professional manner" to quote your e-mail. These are public radio
stations - not your private little fiefdom to run
as you and your cohorts so choose! What
I am trying to tell you and the rest of your cronies is that your behavior
cannot be justified to people who are not personally involved in this matter.
Dr. Berry may "sign the checks" as you so quaintly put it, but the radio stations are publicly funded - a concept the current Pacifica board doesn't seem to be able to understand, and which includes having to account for expenditures to your contributors. For instance, I am wondering what the justification is for hiring non-uniformed "security guards" and the manner in which that was handled. (In the private sector most people aren't in their offices on Saturday to read memos about a new security force starting Monday morning!) Imagine if you arrived (unaware) at your office on a Monday morning only to be greeted (or should I say accosted) by a non-uniformed and surly security guard demanding to know who YOU are. I would demand that someone I knew in authority explain who HE was to be questioning me! And I believe you would do the same. (I listened to a recorded encounter with one of them.)
Mr.. Ford, the bottom line is that if the board
was truly doing their job in a professional manner, this matter would NEVER
have escalated to this point in the first place. Perhaps you should
carefully ponder that before you
continue to try to justify your position any
further.
In conclusion, "crapping" isn't the kind of word I would expect a "professional" person such as yourself to use in what is essentially business correspondence with a stranger - if this is a reflection of the way you normally conduct yourself, it is simply further evidence that you lack the skill, tact and vocabulary necessary for a successful executive. (It wouldn't be acceptable from any of my employees or colleagues.)
Sincerely,
Mrs.. J.L. Ogden
|